5.15.2014

Lady Audley's Super Secret Readalong, week 3



   WELL, I am late to this gravy train, and new to this readalong idea, but I like both the train and the idea so here we are. I've now read up to chapter 15, and this post will spoil many of the events of the book but really you've had quite a few years to read it so this barely counts as spoiling anything.

   Clearly, clearly, Lady Audley's secret is that Lady Audley/Lucy Graham=Helen Talboys and now Lady Audley's OTHER secret is that she pushed poor George Talboys down the well to his watery demise. And of COURSE Phoebe saw it and of COURSE she tole Luke and of COURSE they're blackmailing Lady Audley and they also get married, to which I say "Whyyyyyy so many cousins getting married, M.E. Braddon?"

   Let's lay out a cast of characters:
  • Robert Audley: the favourite. The lazy unintentional hero! 
  • George Talboys: a bit dumb, and now dead :(
  • Alicia Audley: headstrong! Goes hunting! In love with Robert, who is her cousin (whyyyy)
  • Lady Audley/Lucy Graham/Helen Talboys: a sociopath! And surprisingly strong? George is always called a "big dragoon", but tiny Lady Audley can shove him in an old well???
  • Lord Audley: who cares
  • Phoebe Mark: didn't have to change her name when she got married because she married her cousin (uuugh). A potential candidate for another Lady Audley switcheroo! 
  • Blah blah other people.
   Mary Elizabeth Braddon is not good a a few things, mostly subtlety, but this has been a delightful romp so far. 

   I feel bad for Robert, who was George's best friend, and for Alicia, because everyone writes her off. There's so much of the book left! Will Robert and Alicia get married even though they are related by blood? Will Phoebe and Luke be at least marginally happy (no)?? Will Lord Audley stop being a dithering idiot??? Will Lady Audley KILL AGAIN????

5.08.2014

before/after



   Usually it bothers me when I read a child who is written as overly precocious. "That's not the way a baby person would talk or think!" "That child would not be that intelligent or understanding!" I mean, obviously Alia Atreides and nearly all of the characters in Ender's Game/Shadow/etc get a free pass on this one but inter-planetary science fiction is a realm unto it's own. However, I can't be the only person who read Ender's Shadow and was confused by that part where baby-Bean hides in the toilet. At first I was all "so, he hid behind it? What? That is not a very good hiding place." and then I realized that OSC meant he hid IN the tank of the toilet and I was all impressed by imaginary baby-Bean saying "daaaaang, gurl, that water is cold" but the more I thought about it the more ridiculous it was. How did he get the lid back onto the tank? How did he climb up and in there? How did he not perish from hypothermia? Does everyone named Orson think they're a magical genius?

   Regardless of my feelings surrounding Bean and Alia and Ender, I was somewhat concerned going into In The After / Demitria Lunetta. I'd heard many good things about it, but I had also heard that it featured an uncommonly bright six year old. I can suspend my disbelief with the best of them, and I like far-fetched stories, but kids thinking beyond a believable cognitive level? Ugh.

   All my fears were assuaged, however, when Amy found Baby and the two of them began to bond. A story about sisterly BFFs? Working together in a post-apocalyptic world? Never speaking and developing a modified version of American Sign Language instead? Yes please. This is one of the best YA dystopia/science fiction books I have read in a long time. And it's a debut novel! I'm excited for what Lunetta comes up with in the future.

   Basic story line: monsters have invaded the earth and killed/eaten pretty much everyone. Amy was fortunate enough to have a environmentalist father and a paranoid mother, and lives in a veritable fortress. She's able to survive the onslaught, and one night while out scavenging, comes across a toddler in a supermarket. She dubs the girl "Baby", and adopts her as her sister. The book follows their adventures and misadventures, and is exciting and touching and enjoyable. I read it in a day.

5.05.2014


   Here's a very short post to say that I love Batman and that you ought to read The Dark Knight Returns / Frank Miller.

5.02.2014

not dead yet

   HAHAHAHA wow. Thanks, April, for being a weirdly non-productive-but-productive-at-the-same-time month. I think I read maybe two books in April, which is way low for me. Granted, I was busy doing things like finishing a semester of university (woot woot) but still: one post? Two books? In my defense (not in my defense) I did get through an entire season of Lost and a lot of Psych (which is full of hilarity, I gotta say. I recommend it. Crime procedurals! My dearest televised love. [It is available on both Canadian and American Netflix, as is Lost]) And I wrote some big papers and some exams and finished some courses sooooo, April: not a total write-off. I also wrote, but never posted, an extremely long quasi-essay about body image and how I came to stop hating the meat-machine I live in, but it is very long and rambly, and I haven't decided whether or not to edit and post it.

   Okay, I just looked at my Books 2014 list and the number of books I've read since my last post is a whopping ONE. Wowzer, WTH happened. (A side note here. You may have noticed that I often punctuate questions with a full stop instead of a question mark and I want to reassure you that yes: I do know how to use punctuation and am rather good with grammar. It implies a different tone of voice, and I find it funny. When grammar is misused, it should always be done with full knowledge and some motivation/justification as to why. If you know the rules, you can judiciously break them.)

   The book I read was Anne of Windy Poplars / L. M. Montgomery, and it was delightful. I came late to the Anne train, but oh boy do I love her now. And to think I used to revile Anne Shirley. I blame the various Anne of Green Gables movies/miniseries, except maybe the first one which I only have a vague picture of in my head. Anne is great! Long live Anne.

   Here's looking at you, May. Let us hope for a vast improvement in reading amounts.

4.02.2014

four

   Sometimes I read as if there is a freakish banshee after me and literacy is the only way to save myself. And who knows, maybe there is and maybe it is. Regardless, I've finished four (not overly challenging, I admit) books after I posted about At the Mountains of Madness and have discovered a couple of things:
  • Eating while reading is a bad idea for me. I continue to mechanically eat way past the point of fullness. Today I zoned out while reading and polished off a box of rice crackers. I don't even like rice crackers all that much.
  • My patience for Agatha Christie's cheating is beginning to wear thin. More on this later. (I still have a deep affection for Tommy, Tuppence, and Miss Marple though)
    ONTO THE BOOKS, we all say, enough of these boring lists. Hold your horses, I say, the list only had two points, clearly you have been brought up in a fast-paced, media-saturated society and have little to no attention span. "The medium is the message!" someone shouts but it doesn't have much to do with the conversation, they probably just wanted to sound smart. We all decided to get along.

   Shadows / Robin McKinley


   Sometimes I will be reading a book, watching a movie, or consuming some other type of media, and I'll say to myself, "I am enjoying this. However, I feel it would be more effective in a different format." This is one such book, and it would have made an amazing comic. As a regular all-print book it is very good, don't get me wrong, I merely feel that it would have been more effective as a comic book (do not say "don't you mean 'graphic novel'?" because UGH TO THAT and Alan Moore, the man himself, said that The Watchmen was not a "graphic novel" and was in fact a comic book, and if Alan says it, I say it too [in this one case and not many/any others]. Also: why change the name of something just to make yourself feel better about it? Just call it a comic book.)

   So! Maggie is an origami-folding, dog-training, algebra-taking, slang-talking teen (this is a YA novel) and life is all good until her dad dies and her mom remarries and her stepfather is shady. Literally shady! With many shadows. Maggie lives in future-North America, now called Newworld, and magic has been abolished. OR HAS IT????????? Read on to find out. It is a fun lil book and may or may not make you want to finally learn to fold something other than a crane or a dragon, which is basically a modified crane.

   It is written in first-person, and Robin McKinley should win a trophy for writing Maggie's voice to sound like a teenager actually would. There are tangents! There is slang! Best of all: there is little to no exposition. Want detailed background info on what exactly a cobey or a silverbug is? Too bad. How did the whole world get to this point? Read between the lines and figure it out as best you can. Are those actual dog-training techniques? Ask your friend who is a dog trainer, this book ain't giving it up. I appreciate this. Imagine for a moment that Katniss didn't explain what the Hunger Games were or how they worked: imagine the building tension as you continued to read and figure it out. Now take that feeling of "oh! that would've been great!" and apply it to Shadows. Thank you, Robin McKinley, for assuming that I am not stupid, and for making the effort to make a teen sound teen-like. It's downright refreshing.

The Never List / Koethi Zan


   Have you ever read a few similar books in succession and then said to yourself, "how did that happen? How did I just read four books about British ex-pats/explorers/space travel?" WELL, I started reading this and said to myself "I seem to be on a train of scary books, and this is no exception." And then I continued reading and said "I am uncomfortable with this situation" at some parts, and "there is no point at having this in the story" at some parts, and "aaagggggh, stop making bad choices" at some parts, and "being locked in a basement for three years must be a difficult situation to write about, because the mental state that would create is probably nearly impossible for anyone to understand" throughout the whole thing. Oh, and "just leave this to the police! THE POLIIIIICE" pretty often as well.

   This book sits pretty firmly at the two-and-a-half stars mark. It's not terrible, it's not great, it just is. There are tense bits and bits where I had to concentrate on suspending my disbelief, and I figured out the big twist at the end. It probably belongs with other run of the mill thrillers. Meh. Skip it, read something else. "Koethi" is a really excellent name though.

A Life in Stitches / Rachael Herron


   Non-fiction! I haven't written about much non-fic here yet! How exciting. Here is how to tell if you are the ideal audience for this book: do you enjoy knitting, want to learn to knit, like knitwear, or have strong opinions about yarn? This book is for you. I've been wanting to learn to knit for quite some time, and this short little number gave fuel to my knitting-fire, and I re-taught myself how to knit when I finished it.

And Then There Were None / Agatha Christie


   Oh, Agatha. You know I love you, I really do. This book, however, has put that love to the test. You've gotten cocky, you and your story-telling cheating. People told me it was the best Christie they'd read, and I trusted them. I trusted you! Granted: the scenes are set and the characters described in your usual spot-on fashion, and the creepiness of the whole situation is pervasive. And then it was poisonously insulting at the end. Stop doing that! Stop laying a billion red herrings in every scene! Stop withholding game-changing information! Stop it! Usually I am fine with not figuring it out. I don't really expect to with your books. Usually, however, I get to the explanation and the denouement and I say "how clever! If I had been very attentive, I could have gathered that information" (well, with Tommy, Tuppence, and Miss Marple at least. Not usually with Hercule. I get why you didn't like him, Agatha. But you made him that way) BUT THIS BOOK. Oh the frustration when reading the last chapter.